Redstone Mortgages v B Legal
Costs should be apportioned to do broad justice between parties, with one quarter of generic costs attributed to each action. Redstone to pay B Legal's costs in Welch and Sher, assessed on standard basis. Redstone's costs in Howard and McOwen to be treated as claimant's costs, with liberty to apply to vary if B Legal relies on a prior offer. No indemnity basis warranted. No special order for generic costs liability; costs in Howard and McOwen to be treated as claimant's costs in case, not reserved or capped.
- Parties
- Claimant: Redstone Mortgages; Defendant: B Legal
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 March 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Costs Ruling After Determination of Preliminary Issues
- Outcome
- Costs apportioned as specified; Redstone to pay B Legal's costs in Welch and Sher; Redstone's costs in Howard and McOwen treated as claimant's costs; no indemnity basis; liberty to apply to vary in Howard and McOwen.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Preliminary Issues, Solicitor's Duties, Assessment of Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Redstone Mortgages
Claimant
B Legal
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Costs Ruling After Determination of Preliminary Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 What are the terms and scope of the duties owed by B Legal to Redstone on each of the four transactions?
- 2 Did B Legal discharge such duties in each case?
- 3 How should costs be apportioned between generic and specific issues across the four actions?
Ratio Decidendi
Costs should be apportioned to do broad justice between parties, with one quarter of generic costs attributed to each action. Redstone to pay B Legal's costs in Welch and Sher, assessed on standard basis. Redstone's costs in Howard and McOwen to be treated as claimant's costs, with liberty to apply to vary if B Legal relies on a prior offer. No indemnity basis warranted. No special order for generic costs liability; costs in Howard and McOwen to be treated as claimant's costs in case, not reserved or capped.
Court Disposition
Costs apportioned as specified; Redstone to pay B Legal's costs in Welch and Sher; Redstone's costs in Howard and McOwen treated as claimant's costs; no indemnity basis; liberty to apply to vary in Howard and McOwen.
Orders
- Redstone to pay B Legal's costs of the action in Welch, assessed on standard basis; one quarter of generic costs attributable to Welch.
- Redstone to pay B Legal's costs of the action in Sher, assessed on standard basis; one quarter of generic costs attributable to Sher.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment