B v B
The English court had no jurisdiction to order payment of costs relating to Hague Convention proceedings in Germany or the father's travel expenses; the costs order below was flawed both in substance and process and must be replaced with an order limited to the father's costs of the English proceedings, with a reduced payment on account.
- Parties
- Appellant: B (Mother); Respondent: B (Father)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (family) / Appeal Against Costs Order After Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; costs order varied
- Legal Topics
- Costs Orders, Jurisdiction, Hague Convention, Child Abduction, Children Act 1989
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
B (Mother)
Appellant
B (Father)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal (family) / Appeal Against Costs Order After Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the English court had jurisdiction to order payment of costs relating to Hague Convention proceedings in Germany
- 2 Whether the costs order made by the lower court was valid and properly particularised
Ratio Decidendi
The English court had no jurisdiction to order payment of costs relating to Hague Convention proceedings in Germany or the father's travel expenses; the costs order below was flawed both in substance and process and must be replaced with an order limited to the father's costs of the English proceedings, with a reduced payment on account.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; costs order varied
Orders
- Mother to pay father's costs of and incidental to his application for the return of the children dated 6th September 2012, heard on 10th September 2012
- Mother to pay £3,000 on account of those costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment