B v B
A rounded figure of £820,000 representing the husband's pre-marital wealth is excluded from the sharing principle. The wife's reasonable capital and income needs amount to £1.74m, which is a fair division reflecting both needs and sharing principles. The evidence does not establish cohabitation by the wife. The husband is to pay a lump sum to the wife, and there will be a clean break between the parties.
- Parties
- Applicant: B; Respondent: B
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 January 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Financial Remedy (matrimonial) / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted in part; financial remedy order made.
- Legal Topics
- Financial Remedies, Ancillary Relief, Division of Assets, Pre Marital Wealth, Needs Principle, Sharing Principle, Cohabitation, Clean Break
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
B
Applicant
B
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Financial Remedy (matrimonial) / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 How should pre-marital wealth be treated in the division of assets on divorce?
- 2 What are the wife's reasonable capital and income needs?
- 3 Should the sharing principle or needs principle apply?
Ratio Decidendi
A rounded figure of £820,000 representing the husband's pre-marital wealth is excluded from the sharing principle. The wife's reasonable capital and income needs amount to £1.74m, which is a fair division reflecting both needs and sharing principles. The evidence does not establish cohabitation by the wife. The husband is to pay a lump sum to the wife, and there will be a clean break between the parties.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part; financial remedy order made.
Orders
- Former matrimonial home transferred to husband subject to mortgages; husband to indemnify wife.
- Wife to transfer her AG Co shares to husband; husband to indemnify wife for tax liabilities arising from transfer.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment