B v C & Anor
The court found that enforcing contact or changing residence would be contrary to E's welfare given her age, entrenched views, and emotional vulnerability, and that all avenues for enforcement had been exhausted without success. The mother's breach was established beyond reasonable doubt, but no further enforcement order was made as it would likely cause harm to E.
- Parties
- Applicant: B; Respondent: C; Child: E
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 March 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Child Arrangements Enforcement / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; no order made for enforcement or child arrangements.
- Legal Topics
- Child Arrangements Order, Enforcement, Welfare of the Child, Parental Alienation, Home Education, Child Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
B
Applicant
C
Respondent
E
Child
Procedural Posture
Child Arrangements Enforcement / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to enforce a child arrangements order
- 2 Whether a change of residence or direct contact is in the child's welfare
- 3 Whether the mother had reasonable excuse for breach
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that enforcing contact or changing residence would be contrary to E's welfare given her age, entrenched views, and emotional vulnerability, and that all avenues for enforcement had been exhausted without success. The mother's breach was established beyond reasonable doubt, but no further enforcement order was made as it would likely cause harm to E.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; no order made for enforcement or child arrangements.
Orders
- No order on father's application for child arrangements order.
- No unpaid work order imposed on mother.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment