B v C

B v C

The court clarified that it had considered and made detailed and comprehensive provisions for the father's contact with the child in its order of 20 April 2016, taking into account the father's intention to move to Israel. The arrangements made were in the best welfare interests of the child.

Parties
Applicant: B; Respondent: C
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
20 June 2016
Procedural Posture
Family / Supplemental Judgment Clarifying Earlier Judgment and Order
Outcome
Clarification of previous orders; no substantive change to prior orders.
Legal Topics
Child Custody, Relocation, Contact Arrangements
Family Law Child Custody Relocation Contact Arrangements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

B

Applicant

C

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Family / Supplemental Judgment Clarifying Earlier Judgment and Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the court addressed the issue of the father's contact with the child in the previous hearing
  2. 2 Clarification of the court's order regarding contact between the father and the child

Ratio Decidendi

The court clarified that it had considered and made detailed and comprehensive provisions for the father's contact with the child in its order of 20 April 2016, taking into account the father's intention to move to Israel. The arrangements made were in the best welfare interests of the child.

Court Disposition

Clarification of previous orders; no substantive change to prior orders.

Orders

  • The child shall live with the mother in Israel.
  • The mother is permitted to relocate with the child to Israel.