B v L
M was habitually resident in England at the time of removal and at the time of the father's application; the father had acquired inchoate rights of custody and was exercising them; the removal to Poland was wrongful under the Hague Conventions; the English court retains jurisdiction; parental responsibility should be granted to the father.
- Parties
- Applicant: B; Respondent: L
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 August 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Family / Judgment
- Outcome
- Declarations granted; parental responsibility order made; application for return adjourned.
- Legal Topics
- Habitual Residence, Rights of Custody, Parental Responsibility, Wrongful Removal, Jurisdiction, Hague Convention
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
B
Applicant
L
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Was M habitually resident in England at the time of removal?
- 2 Did the father have rights of custody at the time of removal?
- 3 Was the removal to Poland wrongful under the Hague Conventions?
Ratio Decidendi
M was habitually resident in England at the time of removal and at the time of the father's application; the father had acquired inchoate rights of custody and was exercising them; the removal to Poland was wrongful under the Hague Conventions; the English court retains jurisdiction; parental responsibility should be granted to the father.
Court Disposition
Declarations granted; parental responsibility order made; application for return adjourned.
Orders
- Declaration that M was habitually resident in England and Wales as at 7 March 2022.
- Declaration that M was habitually resident in England and Wales on 6 April 2022 and 7 April 2022.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment