B v Secretary of State for Work & Pensions
The statutory meaning of 'failed to disclose' in section 71 of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 admits of no qualification based on the claimant's appreciation of her obligation; once the claimant knows the material fact and is able to communicate it, failure to disclose is established regardless of mental capacity or understanding. The legislation does not support a fault-based or 'reasonable expectation' test, and the recovery of overpaid benefits in these circumstances does not breach the European Convention on Human Rights.
- Parties
- Appellant: B; Respondent: The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 July 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Tribunal of Social Security Commissioners to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Overpayment Recovery, Disclosure Obligations, Mental Capacity, Statutory Interpretation, Human Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
B
Appellant
The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Tribunal of Social Security Commissioners to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a claimant with limited mental capacity who does not appreciate her obligation to disclose a material fact can be said to have 'failed to disclose' under section 71 of the Social Security Administration Act 1992
- 2 Whether the statutory scheme admits a qualification based on the claimant's understanding or fault
- 3 Whether the recovery of overpaid benefits in these circumstances is compatible with Article 14 and Article 1 of the First Protocol of the European Convention on Human Rights
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory meaning of 'failed to disclose' in section 71 of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 admits of no qualification based on the claimant's appreciation of her obligation; once the claimant knows the material fact and is able to communicate it, failure to disclose is established regardless of mental capacity or understanding. The legislation does not support a fault-based or 'reasonable expectation' test, and the recovery of overpaid benefits in these circumstances does not breach the European Convention on Human Rights.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment