Babula v Waltham Forest College

Babula v Waltham Forest College

A worker does not need to prove an actual criminal offence or legal obligation for a disclosure to be protected under ERA 1996 section 43B(1); it is sufficient that the worker reasonably believes the information tends to show such an offence or obligation. The contrary statement in Kraus v Penna is incorrect and should not be followed.

Parties
Appellant: Babula; Respondent: Waltham Forest College
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
07 March 2007
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Whistleblowing, Protected Disclosure, Unfair Dismissal, Reasonable Belief, Statutory Interpretation
Employment Law Whistleblowing Protected Disclosure Unfair Dismissal Reasonable Belief Statutory Interpretation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Babula

Appellant

Waltham Forest College

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal to Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Does a worker need to point to an actual criminal offence or legal obligation for a disclosure to be protected under ERA 1996 section 43B(1), or is a reasonable belief sufficient?
  2. 2 Is the reasoning in Kraus v Penna plc correct regarding the requirement for an actual legal obligation or offence?

Ratio Decidendi

A worker does not need to prove an actual criminal offence or legal obligation for a disclosure to be protected under ERA 1996 section 43B(1); it is sufficient that the worker reasonably believes the information tends to show such an offence or obligation. The contrary statement in Kraus v Penna is incorrect and should not be followed.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Chairman's order set aside
  • Case remitted to a fresh Employment Tribunal for case management and adjudication