Assani, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 2563 (19 November 2008)
The exclusion of evidence regarding Heffernan's alleged bad character was correct under the statutory regime, as it lacked probative value and was not prosecution evidence. The minimum term of twenty years was manifestly excessive, as intention to kill should not increase the minimum period and there was little premeditation.
- Citation
- [2008] EWCA Crim 2563
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Appellant/defendant: Dale Steven Assani
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 November 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal (criminal Division) Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against sentence allowed in part.
- Legal Topics
- Bad Character Evidence, Murder, Minimum Sentence, Criminal Justice Act 2003, Appeal Against Conviction, Appeal Against Sentence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Dale Steven Assani
Appellant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal (criminal Division) Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether exclusion of evidence of co-defendant's alleged bad character rendered conviction unsafe
- 2 Appropriate minimum term for life sentence for murder
Ratio Decidendi
The exclusion of evidence regarding Heffernan's alleged bad character was correct under the statutory regime, as it lacked probative value and was not prosecution evidence. The minimum term of twenty years was manifestly excessive, as intention to kill should not increase the minimum period and there was little premeditation.
Court Disposition
Appeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against sentence allowed in part.
Orders
- Minimum term of twenty years quashed and substituted with seventeen years.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment