Badger Trust, R (on the application of) v SSEFRA
Section 10(2)(a) of the Protection of Badgers Act 1992 is not limited to preventing the spread of disease outside the licensed area; it encompasses reducing the incidence of disease within the area, and the Secretary of State's policy is lawful.
- Parties
- Appellant: Badger Trust; Respondent: SSEFRA
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Construction, Licensing for Animal Culling, Powers Under Protection of Badgers Act 1992, Animal Health Act 1981
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Badger Trust
Appellant
SSEFRA
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Section 10(2)(a) of the Protection of Badgers Act 1992 empowers the grant of licences for culling badgers to reduce the incidence of bovine TB
- 2 Statutory interpretation of 'preventing the spread of disease' versus 'reduce the incidence of disease'
- 3 Legislative history and purpose of licensing powers for badger culling
Ratio Decidendi
Section 10(2)(a) of the Protection of Badgers Act 1992 is not limited to preventing the spread of disease outside the licensed area; it encompasses reducing the incidence of disease within the area, and the Secretary of State's policy is lawful.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment