Northrop Grumman Mission Systems Europe Ltd v BAE Systems (Al Diriyah C4I) Ltd (No 2)

Northrop Grumman Mission Systems Europe Ltd v BAE Systems (Al Diriyah C4I) Ltd (No 2)

BAE's refusal to mediate was unreasonable given the nature of the dispute and reasonable prospects of success for mediation, despite BAE's reasonable belief in its strong case. However, both parties' conduct, including NGM's failure to accept a reasonable settlement offer, meant that neither party's conduct should modify the general rule on costs. Therefore, NGM is to pay BAE's costs without reduction.

Parties
Claimant: Northrop Grumman Mission Systems Europe Limited; Defendant: BAE Systems (Al Diriyah C4I) Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
03 October 2014
Procedural Posture
Civil (commercial/contract) / Costs Ruling Following Judgment on Contractual Interpretation
Outcome
Costs awarded to BAE without reduction; NGM to pay BAE's costs assessed on a standard basis if not agreed.
Legal Topics
Costs, Alternative Dispute Resolution (adr), Refusal to Mediate, Contractual Interpretation
Civil Procedure Commercial Law Contract Law Costs Alternative Dispute Resolution (adr) Refusal to Mediate Contractual Interpretation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Northrop Grumman Mission Systems Europe Limited

Claimant

BAE Systems (Al Diriyah C4I) Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil (commercial/contract) / Costs Ruling Following Judgment on Contractual Interpretation

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether BAE's refusal to mediate was unreasonable and should result in a reduction of its costs entitlement
  2. 2 Whether the nature of the dispute, merits, and conduct justified refusal to mediate
  3. 3 Appropriate costs order in light of parties' conduct

Ratio Decidendi

BAE's refusal to mediate was unreasonable given the nature of the dispute and reasonable prospects of success for mediation, despite BAE's reasonable belief in its strong case. However, both parties' conduct, including NGM's failure to accept a reasonable settlement offer, meant that neither party's conduct should modify the general rule on costs. Therefore, NGM is to pay BAE's costs without reduction.

Court Disposition

Costs awarded to BAE without reduction; NGM to pay BAE's costs assessed on a standard basis if not agreed.

Orders

  • NGM to pay BAE's costs, to be assessed on a standard basis if not agreed.
  • No reduction in costs due to refusal to mediate.