Jackson & Anor v Baker Tilly & Anor

Jackson & Anor v Baker Tilly & Anor

The Applicants (liquidators) have established a reasonable requirement for the Respondents' documents to fulfill their statutory duties under sections 235 and 236 of the Insolvency Act 1986. The request is not unreasonable or oppressive given the Respondents' professional capacity and the organization of their files. Confidentiality concerns regarding third-party documents (Minton Group/Additional Party) can be addressed by allowing time for objections and possible redaction. The order for production of documents is granted, subject to safeguards for confidentiality and privilege.

Parties
Applicant (joint Liquidator of Alocasia Limited): Bryan Jackson; Applicant (joint Liquidator of Alocasia Limited): James Douglas Ernle Money; Respondent: Baker Tilly; Respondent: Baker Tilly UK Audit LLP; Additional Party: Minton Group (including directors and company secretary)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
10 April 2014
Procedural Posture
Insolvency Application / Judgment on Application for Production of Documents Under Sections 235 and 236 of the Insolvency Act 1986
Outcome
Application granted in part; order for production of documents and witness statement made, with safeguards for confidentiality and privilege; application for oral examination adjourned.
Legal Topics
Liquidators' Powers, Production of Documents, Confidentiality in Insolvency, Third Party Disclosure, Audit and Tax Advice Liability
Insolvency Law Company Law Liquidators' Powers Production of Documents Confidentiality in Insolvency Third Party Disclosure Audit and Tax Advice Liability

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bryan Jackson

Applicant (joint Liquidator of Alocasia Limited)

James Douglas Ernle Money

Applicant (joint Liquidator of Alocasia Limited)

Baker Tilly

Respondent

Baker Tilly UK Audit LLP

Respondent

Minton Group (including directors and company secretary)

Additional Party

Procedural Posture

Insolvency Application / Judgment on Application for Production of Documents Under Sections 235 and 236 of the Insolvency Act 1986

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Applicants (liquidators) have a reasonable requirement for the production of documents from the Respondents under sections 235 and 236 of the Insolvency Act 1986
  2. 2 Whether the order sought is unreasonable, unnecessary, or oppressive to the Respondents
  3. 3 How to address issues of confidentiality and privilege regarding documents relating to third parties (Minton Group/Additional Party)

Ratio Decidendi

The Applicants (liquidators) have established a reasonable requirement for the Respondents' documents to fulfill their statutory duties under sections 235 and 236 of the Insolvency Act 1986. The request is not unreasonable or oppressive given the Respondents' professional capacity and the organization of their files. Confidentiality concerns regarding third-party documents (Minton Group/Additional Party) can be addressed by allowing time for objections and possible redaction. The order for production of documents is granted, subject to safeguards for confidentiality and privilege.

Court Disposition

Application granted in part; order for production of documents and witness statement made, with safeguards for confidentiality and privilege; application for oral examination adjourned.

Orders

  • Respondents to produce all papers and records (including audit files, correspondence, and advice) relating to Alocasia Limited for the years 2005 to 2010 by 30 April 2014, subject to a 21-day period for the Minton Group and/or Additional Party to raise confidentiality objections before disclosure becomes effective.
  • Respondents to provide the letter of retainer forthwith; no need for a witness statement on the retainer if provided.