The Official Receiver v Bathurst
The fact that the grant of the charge was not a voidable preference under section 340 but void under section 284 makes no difference to the outcome; the conduct remains relevant under para.2(1) Schedule 4A and justifies a nine-year bankruptcy restrictions order.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: The Official Receiver; Defendant/respondent: William Arthur Bathurst
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 June 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Appeal / Post Judgment Review
- Outcome
- appeal allowed, previous order reviewed and confirmed
- Legal Topics
- Bankruptcy Restrictions Order, Voidable Preference, Void Charge, Review of Court Order
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Official Receiver
Claimant/appellant
William Arthur Bathurst
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Appeal / Post Judgment Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the grant of a charge after presentation of a bankruptcy petition constitutes a voidable preference under section 340 of the Insolvency Act 1986
- 2 Whether the conduct of the bankrupt in granting a void charge is relevant to the making of a bankruptcy restrictions order
- 3 Whether the court should review and alter its previous order based on corrected facts
Ratio Decidendi
The fact that the grant of the charge was not a voidable preference under section 340 but void under section 284 makes no difference to the outcome; the conduct remains relevant under para.2(1) Schedule 4A and justifies a nine-year bankruptcy restrictions order.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed, previous order reviewed and confirmed
Orders
- Bankruptcy restrictions order to subsist for nine years
- Judgment to be read in light of modified reasons
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment