Banner Homes Holdings Ltd v Luff Developments Ltd & Anor [2000] EWCA Civ 3016 (30 March 2000)
The shares in Stowhelm Ltd acquired by Luff were acquired in furtherance of a joint venture arrangement with Banner, and it would be inequitable for Luff to treat them as its own. Therefore, the issued share capital of Stowhelm is held by Luff on trust for itself and Banner in equal shares. The Pallant v Morgan equity does not apply to the site itself, as it was always intended to be acquired as Stowhelm's own asset.
- Citation
- [2000] EWCA Civ 3016
- Parties
- Appellant: Banner Homes Holdings Ltd; Respondent: Luff Developments Ltd; Respondent: Stowhelm Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 March 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part, application to amend notice of appeal dismissed, declaration of trust over shares granted, consequential orders made, costs awarded to Banner and Stowhelm, permission to appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Trusts, Joint Venture, Shareholding, Pallant V Morgan Equity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Banner Homes Holdings Ltd
Appellant
Luff Developments Ltd
Respondent
Stowhelm Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether shares in Stowhelm Ltd are held on constructive trust for Banner and Luff in equal shares
- 2 Whether the site acquired by Stowhelm is held on trust for Banner
- 3 Whether the Pallant v Morgan equity applies to the acquisition of shares and/or the site
Ratio Decidendi
The shares in Stowhelm Ltd acquired by Luff were acquired in furtherance of a joint venture arrangement with Banner, and it would be inequitable for Luff to treat them as its own. Therefore, the issued share capital of Stowhelm is held by Luff on trust for itself and Banner in equal shares. The Pallant v Morgan equity does not apply to the site itself, as it was always intended to be acquired as Stowhelm's own asset.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part, application to amend notice of appeal dismissed, declaration of trust over shares granted, consequential orders made, costs awarded to Banner and Stowhelm, permission to appeal refused.
Orders
- Application to amend notice of appeal to claim site held on trust dismissed.
- Appeal against order dismissing action allowed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment