Graiseley Properties Ltd & Ors v Barclays Bank Plc & Ors
Permission to amend pleadings to allege implied representations regarding LIBOR manipulation is arguable and should not be summarily dismissed; novation may not have extinguished rescission rights or may have been only partial, thus amendments on rescission are also arguable.
- Parties
- Claimant: Graiseley Properties Limited & Ors; Defendant: Barclays Bank Plc; Claimant: Deutsche Bank AG; Claimant: DBS Bank Limited; Claimant: BBK B. S. C.; Claimant: Shinhan Bank; Claimant: LIREF (Singapore) Pte Ltd; Claimant: PT. Bank Negara Indonesia (Persero) TBK, Tokyo Branch; Claimant: BMI Bank BSC; Claimant: DB International (Asia) Limited; Claimant: Axis Specialty Limited; Claimant: DB Trustees (Hong Kong) Limited; Defendant: Unitech Global Limited; Defendant: Unitech Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Permission to Amend Pleadings
- Outcome
- Appeal from Cooke J allowed; appeal from Flaux J dismissed; permission to amend pleadings granted.
- Legal Topics
- Implied Representations, Misrepresentation, Novation, LIBOR Manipulation, Fraudulent Inducement, Breach of Warranty, Negligent Misrepresentation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Graiseley Properties Limited & Ors
Claimant
Barclays Bank Plc
Defendant
Deutsche Bank AG
Claimant
DBS Bank Limited
Claimant
BBK B. S. C.
Claimant
Shinhan Bank
Claimant
LIREF (Singapore) Pte Ltd
Claimant
PT. Bank Negara Indonesia (Persero) TBK, Tokyo Branch
Claimant
BMI Bank BSC
Claimant
DB International (Asia) Limited
Claimant
Axis Specialty Limited
Claimant
DB Trustees (Hong Kong) Limited
Claimant
Unitech Global Limited
Defendant
Unitech Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Permission to Amend Pleadings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether banks made implied representations regarding LIBOR integrity in loan and swap agreements
- 2 Whether permission to amend pleadings to allege implied representations should be granted
- 3 Effect of novation on rescission rights in credit agreements
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to amend pleadings to allege implied representations regarding LIBOR manipulation is arguable and should not be summarily dismissed; novation may not have extinguished rescission rights or may have been only partial, thus amendments on rescission are also arguable.
Court Disposition
Appeal from Cooke J allowed; appeal from Flaux J dismissed; permission to amend pleadings granted.
Orders
- Permission to amend pleadings to allege implied representations regarding LIBOR manipulation granted.
- Appeal from Cooke J refusing permission to amend allowed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment