Change Red Ltd v Barclays Bank Plc
The meaning of 'turnover' as used in the FCA agreement, which refers to the Companies Act 2006, is a question of law for the court and not a matter for expert accountancy evidence. Therefore, expert evidence on the meaning or calculation of 'turnover' is inadmissible. Consequently, non-expert opinion evidence from...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Change Red Limited; Defendant: Barclays Bank PLC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (commercial/banking) / Ruling on Case Management Conference (cmc) Regarding Admissibility of Expert Evidence
- Outcome
- Expert accountancy evidence on the meaning of 'turnover' is inadmissible; non-expert opinion evidence from the claimant's director on this issue is also inadmissible, subject to further submissions.
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Contracts, Admissibility of Expert Evidence, Revision of Company Accounts, Definition of Turnover Under Companies Act, FCA Redress Scheme Eligibility
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Change Red Limited
Claimant
Barclays Bank PLC
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (commercial/banking) / Ruling on Case Management Conference (cmc) Regarding Admissibility of Expert Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant bank was obliged to have regard to the claimant’s revised annual accounts in determining eligibility for FCA review
- 2 Whether expert accountancy evidence is admissible on the meaning of 'turnover' in the FCA agreement context
Ratio Decidendi
The meaning of 'turnover' as used in the FCA agreement, which refers to the Companies Act 2006, is a question of law for the court and not a matter for expert accountancy evidence. Therefore, expert evidence on the meaning or calculation of 'turnover' is inadmissible. Consequently, non-expert opinion evidence from the claimant's director on this point is also inadmissible.
Court Disposition
Expert accountancy evidence on the meaning of 'turnover' is inadmissible; non-expert opinion evidence from the claimant's director on this issue is also inadmissible, subject to further submissions.
Orders
- Permission to adduce expert accountancy evidence refused.
- Passages of Mr. Klempka’s first witness statement identified for potential striking out, subject to further submissions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment