(1) Pcp Capital Partners Llp (2) Pcp International Finance Ltd v Barclays Bank Plc
Barclays, by relying on legal advice in witness statements and trial opening to support the lawfulness of the ASAs, waived privilege over all legal advice relating to the ASAs. Fairness requires disclosure of all such privileged documents, not just those already made public. The application for further disclosure is granted.
- Parties
- Claimant: PCP Capital Partners LLP; Claimant: PCP International Finance Ltd; Defendant: Barclays Bank Plc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 June 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Civil Claim / Interlocutory Application for Further Disclosure
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Legal Professional Privilege, Waiver of Privilege, Disclosure of Documents, Sham Transactions, Financial Assistance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
PCP Capital Partners LLP
Claimant
PCP International Finance Ltd
Claimant
Barclays Bank Plc
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Civil Claim / Interlocutory Application for Further Disclosure
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Barclays waived legal professional privilege over legal advice relating to the ASAs by references in witness statements and trial opening
- 2 Whether further privileged documents relating to the ASAs must be disclosed as a result of waiver
- 3 Whether redactions in interview transcripts should be lifted where they refer to the same or substantially the same information as already disclosed documents
Ratio Decidendi
Barclays, by relying on legal advice in witness statements and trial opening to support the lawfulness of the ASAs, waived privilege over all legal advice relating to the ASAs. Fairness requires disclosure of all such privileged documents, not just those already made public. The application for further disclosure is granted.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Barclays to disclose all contemporaneous documents and interview transcripts previously withheld on grounds of privilege concerning the ASAs, as set out in paragraph 1.1 of the Application Notice.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment