Kays Hotels Ltd (Trading As Claydon Country House Hotel) v Barclays Bank Plc
The application for summary judgment/strike out is dismissed because the claimant has a real prospect of establishing entitlement to rely on Section 14A of the Limitation Act 1980, and the issue of knowledge is fact-sensitive and unsuitable for summary determination.
- Parties
- Claimant: Kays Hotels Ltd (trading as Claydon Country House Hotel); Defendant: Barclays Bank PLC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 May 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (commercial) / Application for Summary Judgment/strike Out
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Limitation of Actions, Mis Selling of Financial Products, Negligence, Summary Judgment, Suitability of Financial Products
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kays Hotels Ltd (trading as Claydon Country House Hotel)
Claimant
Barclays Bank PLC
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (commercial) / Application for Summary Judgment/strike Out
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claim for negligent mis-selling of an interest rate hedging product is time-barred under the Limitation Act 1980, Section 14A
- 2 Whether the claimant had the requisite knowledge to bring a claim more than three years before issuing proceedings
- 3 Whether the essence of the claim is suitability/mis-selling or merely advice about interest rate risk
Ratio Decidendi
The application for summary judgment/strike out is dismissed because the claimant has a real prospect of establishing entitlement to rely on Section 14A of the Limitation Act 1980, and the issue of knowledge is fact-sensitive and unsuitable for summary determination.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The defendant's application for summary judgment and/or strike out is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment