Raqeeb, R (On the Application Of) v Begum & Anor
There is no evidence that XX has failed to fairly and competently conduct proceedings or has interests adverse to Tafida; familial love and religious beliefs do not automatically render a litigation friend unsuitable, and removal at this late stage would unjustifiably delay proceedings and harm Tafida's interests.
- Parties
- Claimant: Tafida Raqeeb (by her Litigation Friend XX); Defendant: Barts Health NHS Trust; Interested Parties: Shelina Begum and Mohammed Raqeeb
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 November 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Ruling on Application to Terminate Litigation Friend
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Litigation Friend Appointment, Judicial Review, Children's Rights, Religious Beliefs in Litigation, Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tafida Raqeeb (by her Litigation Friend XX)
Claimant
Barts Health NHS Trust
Defendant
Shelina Begum and Mohammed Raqeeb
Interested Parties
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Ruling on Application to Terminate Litigation Friend
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether XX should be discharged as Tafida's litigation friend in judicial review proceedings
- 2 Whether familial love and religious beliefs constitute interests adverse to the child
- 3 Whether there has been a material change in circumstances justifying removal of litigation friend
Ratio Decidendi
There is no evidence that XX has failed to fairly and competently conduct proceedings or has interests adverse to Tafida; familial love and religious beliefs do not automatically render a litigation friend unsuitable, and removal at this late stage would unjustifiably delay proceedings and harm Tafida's interests.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- XX remains litigation friend for Tafida Raqeeb in judicial review proceedings
- Barts Health NHS Trust to pay costs of XX and interested parties occasioned by the application, assessed on standard basis if not agreed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment