Egan v Basildon Borough Council
The Council cannot, under section 178 or its incidental powers, demolish or remove buildings, walls, fences, or gates that were unlawfully present before the enforcement notice and not mentioned in it; such action requires a specific enforcement notice. However, structures unlawfully erected after the notice may be removed if necessary for compliance. There are triable issues as to the date and nature of certain structures, and the onus of proof lies on the residents.
- Parties
- Claimant: Patrick Egan; Defendant: Basildon Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 September 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Injunction Application / Interlocutory Judgment on Interim Injunction
- Outcome
- Interim injunction continued; further hearing ordered to determine triable issues.
- Legal Topics
- Enforcement Notices, Section 178 Town and Country Planning Act 1990, Local Authority Powers, Planning Control, Judicial Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Patrick Egan
Claimant
Basildon Borough Council
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Injunction Application / Interlocutory Judgment on Interim Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Council can demolish or remove buildings, walls, fences, and gates not mentioned in enforcement notices under section 178 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
- 2 Whether the Council can take action under section 178 in relation to matters previously addressed by 1992 enforcement notices
- 3 Whether certain structures are 'caravans' within the meaning of the Caravan Sites Act 1968 and enforcement notices
Ratio Decidendi
The Council cannot, under section 178 or its incidental powers, demolish or remove buildings, walls, fences, or gates that were unlawfully present before the enforcement notice and not mentioned in it; such action requires a specific enforcement notice. However, structures unlawfully erected after the notice may be removed if necessary for compliance. There are triable issues as to the date and nature of certain structures, and the onus of proof lies on the residents.
Court Disposition
Interim injunction continued; further hearing ordered to determine triable issues.
Orders
- Further hearing to determine facts regarding date and nature of structures to be removed or demolished.
- Directions to be given for speedy trial of triable issues.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment