Basildon District Council v McCarthy & Ors
The Council's decision to take action under section 178 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990 was lawful. The Council had adequately considered the personal circumstances of the claimants, its duties under the Housing Act 1996, and equality legislation. The absence of alternative sites and the ongoing development plan process did not render the decision unlawful. The Council was not required to delay enforcement pending further homelessness investigations or to provide alternative sites outside the statutory planning framework.
- Parties
- Appellant: Basildon District Council; Respondent: McCarthy & Ors; Respondent: Culligan & Ors; Respondent: Coyle & Ors; Respondent: Taylor & Ors; Intervener: Equality & Human Rights Commission
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 January 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Enforcement of Planning Notices, Homelessness Duties, Race and Disability Equality Duties, Article 8 ECHR, Development Plan Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Basildon District Council
Appellant
McCarthy & Ors
Respondent
Culligan & Ors
Respondent
Coyle & Ors
Respondent
Taylor & Ors
Respondent
Equality & Human Rights Commission
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Basildon District Council's decision to take direct action under section 178 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990 was lawful
- 2 Whether the Council properly considered its duties under the Housing Act 1996 and equality legislation
- 3 Whether individual circumstances of the claimants were adequately considered
Ratio Decidendi
The Council's decision to take action under section 178 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990 was lawful. The Council had adequately considered the personal circumstances of the claimants, its duties under the Housing Act 1996, and equality legislation. The absence of alternative sites and the ongoing development plan process did not render the decision unlawful. The Council was not required to delay enforcement pending further homelessness investigations or to provide alternative sites outside the statutory planning framework.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The decision of Collins J quashing the Council's enforcement action is set aside.
- The Council's decision to take action under section 178 stands.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment