Bathurst Ltd, Re: Grasslands [2009] EWLands LP_13_2007 (27 March 2009)
The restriction does not secure any practical benefit to the Association as owner of the estate road, since the road should be adequate for construction traffic and the Association accepted its condition; therefore, the Association would not suffer injury from the modification and the requirements of section 84(1)(aa) and (c) are satisfied.
- Citation
- [2009] EWLands LP_13_2007
- Parties
- Applicant: Bathurst Limited; Objector: Hollies Hill Residents’ Association
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Section 84 of the Law of Property Act 1925 / Final Decision After Hearing
- Outcome
- application granted
- Legal Topics
- Restrictive Covenants, Modification or Discharge of Covenants, Estate Roads, Planning Permission
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bathurst Limited
Applicant
Hollies Hill Residents’ Association
Objector
Procedural Posture
Application Under Section 84 of the Law of Property Act 1925 / Final Decision After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the restrictive covenant should be modified to permit a second dwellinghouse on the property known as Grasslands
- 2 Whether the restriction secures practical benefits of substantial value to the objector
- 3 Whether the objector would suffer injury from the modification
Ratio Decidendi
The restriction does not secure any practical benefit to the Association as owner of the estate road, since the road should be adequate for construction traffic and the Association accepted its condition; therefore, the Association would not suffer injury from the modification and the requirements of section 84(1)(aa) and (c) are satisfied.
Court Disposition
application granted
Orders
- The restrictions in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the Fourth Schedule to the conveyance dated 24 September 1987 are modified to permit the erection of one additional dwelling and private garage on the site of Grasslands in accordance with planning permission S.7426/U, subject to compliance with current building regulations.
- No compensation is awarded to the objector.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment