BB, R (on the application of) v Special Immigration Appeals Commission & Anor
The grant of bail with conditions pending deportation is ancillary to the deportation process, which is a public law function and does not involve the determination of civil rights under article 6(1) ECHR. Therefore, article 6(1) does not apply. Article 8 ECHR requires effective adversarial proceedings and independent scrutiny, but does not require disclosure of the gist of the national security case in the same way as articles 5 or 6. The SIAC procedure satisfies the requirements of article 8 as interpreted by the ECtHR.
- Parties
- Appellant: BB; First Respondent: Special Immigration Appeals Commission; Second Respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 November 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review (appeal) / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Deportation, Bail Conditions, European Convention on Human Rights, Article 6, Article 8, National Security, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BB
Appellant
Special Immigration Appeals Commission
First Respondent
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (appeal) / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the grant of bail with conditions pending deportation involve the determination of civil rights under article 6(1) ECHR?
- 2 Do the procedural guarantees under article 8 ECHR require disclosure of the gist of the national security case in bail proceedings?
Ratio Decidendi
The grant of bail with conditions pending deportation is ancillary to the deportation process, which is a public law function and does not involve the determination of civil rights under article 6(1) ECHR. Therefore, article 6(1) does not apply. Article 8 ECHR requires effective adversarial proceedings and independent scrutiny, but does not require disclosure of the gist of the national security case in the same way as articles 5 or 6. The SIAC procedure satisfies the requirements of article 8 as interpreted by the ECtHR.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment