PP, Re
The PET of £324,000 to JB was not in PP's best interests, as it alters the intended devolution of her estate set out in her will, risks insufficient funds for her care, and lacks evidence of PP's wishes supporting such a gift. The court will not ratify the PET, requires partial restitution, and directs future gifts to be limited and equitable among grandchildren.
- Parties
- Applicant: BB; Respondent: PP
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 May 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Court of Protection Application / Judgment After Final Hearing
- Outcome
- PET of £324,000 not ratified; partial restitution ordered; future gifting restricted; statutory codicil to be drafted; attorneyship issue deferred for further submissions.
- Legal Topics
- Best Interests Decision, Retrospective Ratification of Gifts, Attorney Powers Under Lasting Power of Attorney, Inheritance Tax Planning, Statutory Will/codicil
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BB
Applicant
PP
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Court of Protection Application / Judgment After Final Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Should the court ratify the gift of £324,000 to JB made by PP's attorney?
- 2 Should further gifts made by BB be ratified?
- 3 Should the Octopus IHT investments be reinvested?
Ratio Decidendi
The PET of £324,000 to JB was not in PP's best interests, as it alters the intended devolution of her estate set out in her will, risks insufficient funds for her care, and lacks evidence of PP's wishes supporting such a gift. The court will not ratify the PET, requires partial restitution, and directs future gifts to be limited and equitable among grandchildren.
Court Disposition
PET of £324,000 not ratified; partial restitution ordered; future gifting restricted; statutory codicil to be drafted; attorneyship issue deferred for further submissions.
Orders
- JB to repay £164,000 immediately to PP.
- £160,000 used in property purchase to be brought into hotchpot for JB's share under PP's will via statutory codicil.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment