Utopia Tableware v BBP Marketing [2013] EWPCC 15 (21 January 2013)
There is a properly arguable case that the Aspen design is not commonplace and has been copied by the defendant; damages would not be an adequate remedy for the claimant; the balance of convenience and status quo favour granting an interim injunction pending trial.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] EWPCC 15
- Parties
- Claimant: Utopia Tableware; Defendant: BBP Marketing
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 January 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Interim Injunction Application / Pre Trial
- Outcome
- Interim injunction granted pending trial
- Legal Topics
- Design Right Infringement, Registered Design, Unregistered Design Right, Commonplace Exception, Interim Injunction, Passing Off
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Utopia Tableware
Claimant
BBP Marketing
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Interim Injunction Application / Pre Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant's Aspire glass infringes the claimant's Aspen design right (registered and unregistered)
- 2 Whether the Aspen design is original and not commonplace
- 3 Whether damages are an adequate remedy for the claimant
Ratio Decidendi
There is a properly arguable case that the Aspen design is not commonplace and has been copied by the defendant; damages would not be an adequate remedy for the claimant; the balance of convenience and status quo favour granting an interim injunction pending trial.
Court Disposition
Interim injunction granted pending trial
Orders
- Interim injunction restraining defendant from launching Aspire product pending trial
- Claimant to provide cross-undertaking in damages
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment