Secretary of State for the Home Department, R (on the application of) v BC & Anor
Article 6 ECHR applies to the control orders imposed on BB and BC, regardless of the lighter nature of the obligations. The imposition of such obligations directly affects civil rights, including Convention rights as implemented by the Human Rights Act 1998. Therefore, the minimum disclosure requirements established in AF (No 3) must be met, and the special advocate procedure alone is insufficient if the individual is not given enough information to enable an effective defence.
- Parties
- Claimant: Secretary of State for the Home Department; Defendant: BC; Defendant: BB
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 November 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Control Order Proceedings / Preliminary Ruling on Article 6 ECHR Applicability and Disclosure Requirements
- Outcome
- Preliminary ruling in favour of the defendants (BB and BC); Article 6 applies and minimum disclosure is required.
- Legal Topics
- Control Orders, Article 6 ECHR, Disclosure Obligations, Special Advocates, Fair Trial Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Claimant
BC
Defendant
BB
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Control Order Proceedings / Preliminary Ruling on Article 6 ECHR Applicability and Disclosure Requirements
Legal Issues
- 1 Does Article 6 ECHR apply to the control orders imposed on BB and BC?
- 2 Does the lighter nature of the obligations in the new control orders avoid the requirements of Article 6 and the disclosure obligations established in AF (No 3)?
- 3 Are Convention rights, as implemented by the Human Rights Act 1998, civil rights for the purposes of Article 6?
Ratio Decidendi
Article 6 ECHR applies to the control orders imposed on BB and BC, regardless of the lighter nature of the obligations. The imposition of such obligations directly affects civil rights, including Convention rights as implemented by the Human Rights Act 1998. Therefore, the minimum disclosure requirements established in AF (No 3) must be met, and the special advocate procedure alone is insufficient if the individual is not given enough information to enable an effective defence.
Court Disposition
Preliminary ruling in favour of the defendants (BB and BC); Article 6 applies and minimum disclosure is required.
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted to the Secretary of State.
- Section 3(10) proceedings adjourned pending decision on appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment