BD v FD (No 2) (Application of the Principle of Need)
The wife's financial remedy is determined by the principle of need, not sharing, given the husband's wealth is inherited and not marital property. Her housing and income needs are assessed by reference to the marital standard of living, with some allowance for increased expenditure as children age, but not at the level claimed. An add-back is applied for profligate expenditure. The award is £8.8 million, reflecting fair provision for her needs for life.
- Parties
- Applicant: BD; Respondent: FD
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 March 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Financial Remedy Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted in part; financial remedy awarded based on needs.
- Legal Topics
- Financial Remedies, Matrimonial Property, Needs Principle, Inherited Wealth, Child Maintenance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BD
Applicant
FD
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Financial Remedy Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Assessment of wife's financial needs
- 2 Application of needs versus sharing principle
- 3 Impact of inherited wealth on financial remedy
Ratio Decidendi
The wife's financial remedy is determined by the principle of need, not sharing, given the husband's wealth is inherited and not marital property. Her housing and income needs are assessed by reference to the marital standard of living, with some allowance for increased expenditure as children age, but not at the level claimed. An add-back is applied for profligate expenditure. The award is £8.8 million, reflecting fair provision for her needs for life.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part; financial remedy awarded based on needs.
Orders
- Wife awarded £8.8 million lump sum for housing and income needs for life.
- Child maintenance ordered at £15,000 per year per child until completion of tertiary education.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment