Gallantgreen Ltd v BDB Pitmans LLP
The Defendant's original estimate was relied upon by the Claimant when entering the retainer. The Defendant failed to adequately communicate changes to scope and estimate before incurring further costs. The Claimant is entitled to have the original estimate taken as a yardstick for reasonableness, and recoverable costs are unlikely to exceed the upper end of the estimate (£10,000) plus a 20% margin (£12,000 plus VAT).
- Parties
- Claimant: Gallantgreen Ltd; Defendant: BDB Pitmans LLP
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 March 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Assessment / Detailed Assessment Hearing
- Outcome
- Guidance issued for compromise or further assessment; costs capped at £12,000 plus VAT unless parties persuade otherwise.
- Legal Topics
- Solicitor Client Costs, Estimates, Retainer Agreements, Misrepresentation, Assessment of Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gallantgreen Ltd
Claimant
BDB Pitmans LLP
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Costs Assessment / Detailed Assessment Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Defendant's costs estimate was binding or subject to revision
- 2 Whether the Claimant relied on the Defendant's estimate when entering the retainer
- 3 Whether costs incurred outside the original estimate are recoverable
Ratio Decidendi
The Defendant's original estimate was relied upon by the Claimant when entering the retainer. The Defendant failed to adequately communicate changes to scope and estimate before incurring further costs. The Claimant is entitled to have the original estimate taken as a yardstick for reasonableness, and recoverable costs are unlikely to exceed the upper end of the estimate (£10,000) plus a 20% margin (£12,000 plus VAT).
Court Disposition
Guidance issued for compromise or further assessment; costs capped at £12,000 plus VAT unless parties persuade otherwise.
Orders
- No costs recoverable for work pre-21 December 2023.
- Defendant to consider concessions for duplicated work and complaints process time.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment