Elite Property Holdings Ltd & Ors v BDO LLP
The claim is a collateral attack on findings in the earlier Barclays litigation, specifically the finding that there was no real prospect of showing BDO conspired with Barclays to use unlawful means. The new claim alleges in substance the same conspiracy, and is therefore an abuse of process. Even if not struck out as an abuse, the claim discloses no reasonable grounds and has no real prospect of success as there is no evidence of an agreement between BDO and Barclays to injure the Claimants by unlawful means.
- Parties
- Claimant: Elite Property Holdings Limited; Claimant: Decolave Properties Limited; Claimant: Travelforce Limited; Defendant: BDO LLP
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 July 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Civil Claim / Application to Strike Out Claim And/or Summary Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim struck out as an abuse of process; summary judgment for Defendant in the alternative
- Legal Topics
- Abuse of Process, Collateral Attack, Unlawful Means Conspiracy, Summary Judgment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Elite Property Holdings Limited
Claimant
Decolave Properties Limited
Claimant
Travelforce Limited
Claimant
BDO LLP
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Civil Claim / Application to Strike Out Claim And/or Summary Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claim against BDO LLP is an abuse of process for not being joined in earlier proceedings against Barclays
- 2 Whether the claim constitutes a collateral attack on findings in the earlier Barclays litigation
- 3 Whether the statement of case discloses reasonable grounds for bringing the claim or has a real prospect of success
Ratio Decidendi
The claim is a collateral attack on findings in the earlier Barclays litigation, specifically the finding that there was no real prospect of showing BDO conspired with Barclays to use unlawful means. The new claim alleges in substance the same conspiracy, and is therefore an abuse of process. Even if not struck out as an abuse, the claim discloses no reasonable grounds and has no real prospect of success as there is no evidence of an agreement between BDO and Barclays to injure the Claimants by unlawful means.
Court Disposition
Claim struck out as an abuse of process; summary judgment for Defendant in the alternative
Orders
- Claim struck out as an abuse of process (collateral attack)
- Summary judgment for Defendant (no reasonable prospect of success)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment