Baker v BDS [2021] EWHC 3755 (Ch) (10 December 2021)
It is expedient and appropriate under section 57 of the Trustee Act 1925 to remove the requirement for a professional trustee, as BDS has capacity to manage the trust and the continued requirement is unnecessary and incurs avoidable costs.
- Citation
- [2021] EWHC 3755 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Niall David Baker; Defendant: BDS
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 December 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Part 8 Claim (chancery Division) / Judgment on Application to Amend Trust Deed
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Variation of Trust Deed, Professional Trustees, Section 57 Trustee Act 1925, Personal Injury Trusts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Niall David Baker
Claimant
BDS
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Part 8 Claim (chancery Division) / Judgment on Application to Amend Trust Deed
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should authorise amendment of a trust deed to remove the requirement for a professional trustee under section 57 of the Trustee Act 1925
Ratio Decidendi
It is expedient and appropriate under section 57 of the Trustee Act 1925 to remove the requirement for a professional trustee, as BDS has capacity to manage the trust and the continued requirement is unnecessary and incurs avoidable costs.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- From the date of the order, there is no longer a requirement that at least one trustee be a professional trustee.
- Trustees, so long as they are two in number or a trust corporation, may deal with the capital of the trust fund without a professional trustee.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment