BDW Trading Ltd v Ardmore Construction Ltd & Ors [2025] EWHC 434 (TCC) (27 February 2025)
The statutory condition in section 132(3)(a) of the Building Safety Act 2022 is not satisfied because it does not appear to the court that ACL is subject to a relevant liability; the existence of potential or asserted liability is insufficient. Information orders cannot be made against associates (R2-4) as they are not subject to relevant liability. The application for information orders is therefore refused.
- Citation
- [2025] EWHC 434 (TCC)
- Parties
- Applicant: BDW Trading Limited; First Respondent: Ardmore Construction Limited; Second Respondent: Ardmore Construction Group Limited; Third Respondent: Ardmore Group Limited; Fourth Respondent: Ardmore Group Holdings Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Information Order Under Building Safety Act 2022 / Judgment on Application
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Building Liability Orders, Information Orders, Defective Premises Act 1972, Section 132 Building Safety Act 2022, Corporate Associations, Disclosure of Information
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BDW Trading Limited
Applicant
Ardmore Construction Limited
First Respondent
Ardmore Construction Group Limited
Second Respondent
Ardmore Group Limited
Third Respondent
Ardmore Group Holdings Limited
Fourth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Information Order Under Building Safety Act 2022 / Judgment on Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an information order can be made under section 132 of the Building Safety Act 2022 against the respondents
- 2 Whether the condition in section 132(3)(a) (that the body corporate is subject to a relevant liability) is satisfied
- 3 Whether information orders can be made against associates or only the original body with relevant liability
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory condition in section 132(3)(a) of the Building Safety Act 2022 is not satisfied because it does not appear to the court that ACL is subject to a relevant liability; the existence of potential or asserted liability is insufficient. Information orders cannot be made against associates (R2-4) as they are not subject to relevant liability. The application for information orders is therefore refused.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment