F G Hawkes (Western) Ltd v Beli Shipping Co Ltd
The claimant's failure to serve the claim form within the specified period was due to neglect and prioritisation of another claim, which is not a sufficient reason to justify an extension of time under CPR r.7.6(2). The application to extend time was therefore refused and the previous order extending time was set aside.
- Parties
- Claimant: F G Hawkes (Western) Ltd; Defendant: Beli Shipping Co Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 July 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial / Application to Set Aside Extension of Time for Service of Claim Form
- Outcome
- Defendant's application granted; order extending time for service set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time for Service, Service Out of Jurisdiction, Overriding Objective, Neglect by Legal Representatives
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
F G Hawkes (Western) Ltd
Claimant
Beli Shipping Co Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial / Application to Set Aside Extension of Time for Service of Claim Form
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should set aside the order extending time for service of the claim form
- 2 Whether the claimant's neglect or prioritisation of another claim justified an extension
- 3 Whether the claimant was full and frank in its ex parte application
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant's failure to serve the claim form within the specified period was due to neglect and prioritisation of another claim, which is not a sufficient reason to justify an extension of time under CPR r.7.6(2). The application to extend time was therefore refused and the previous order extending time was set aside.
Court Disposition
Defendant's application granted; order extending time for service set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment