Butler, R. v [2023] EWCA Crim 676 (07 June 2023)
The sentencing judge was entitled to sentence towards the top of the guideline range for category 3/significant role offending, given the facts and aggravating features. The sentence was not manifestly excessive. However, the judge erred in ordering no separate penalty for the lesser offence; the correct procedure is for that count to lie on the file.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Ben Butler
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 June 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- permission to appeal against sentence granted in part; appeal otherwise dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Drug Offences, Money Laundering, Appeals
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Ben Butler
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for possession with intent to supply cannabis and money laundering was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the proper procedure was followed regarding the alternative count of simple possession
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge was entitled to sentence towards the top of the guideline range for category 3/significant role offending, given the facts and aggravating features. The sentence was not manifestly excessive. However, the judge erred in ordering no separate penalty for the lesser offence; the correct procedure is for that count to lie on the file.
Court Disposition
permission to appeal against sentence granted in part; appeal otherwise dismissed
Orders
- quash the sentence of no separate penalty on count 2 (simple possession)
- order that count 2 (simple possession) lie on the file
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment