King, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department

King, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department

The Parole Board must apply the public protection test under sections 255B(3) and 255C(3) when considering the release of recalled determinate sentence prisoners. The test does not permit or require balancing the risk of harm to the public against the benefits of early release; protection of the public is the overriding consideration.

Parties
Appellant: Ben King; Respondent: The Parole Board; Interested Party: The Secretary of State for the Home Department
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
09 February 2016
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal From Divisional Court to Court of Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Parole, Prisoner Release, Statutory Interpretation, Public Protection Test

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ben King

Appellant

The Parole Board

Respondent

The Secretary of State for the Home Department

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Appeal From Divisional Court to Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the Parole Board must apply the public protection test under section 255B(3) and 255C(3) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 when considering release of recalled determinate sentence prisoners
  2. 2 Whether the Parole Board is required or permitted to balance the risk of harm to the public against the benefits of early release

Ratio Decidendi

The Parole Board must apply the public protection test under sections 255B(3) and 255C(3) when considering the release of recalled determinate sentence prisoners. The test does not permit or require balancing the risk of harm to the public against the benefits of early release; protection of the public is the overriding consideration.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed