Murphy & Anor, R. v [2024] EWCA Crim 379 (11 April 2024)

Murphy & Anor, R. v [2024] EWCA Crim 379 (11 April 2024)

The Recorder correctly categorised the offence under Category A1 based on targeting high value goods and use of weapons; prior convictions justified higher sentence for BM; no error in principle or manifest excess in sentences; applications for permission to appeal against sentence refused.

Citation
[2024] EWCA Crim 379
Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Ben Murphy; Applicant: George Murphy-Bristow
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 April 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
applications for permission to appeal against sentence refused
Legal Topics
Robbery, Sentencing Guidelines, Appeal Against Sentence, Categorisation of Harm and Culpability, Disparity in Sentencing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Ben Murphy

Applicant

George Murphy-Bristow

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal Against Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the Recorder erred in categorising the offence under sentencing guidelines
  2. 2 Whether the value of targeted goods was correctly assessed
  3. 3 Whether there was unjustified disparity between sentences

Ratio Decidendi

The Recorder correctly categorised the offence under Category A1 based on targeting high value goods and use of weapons; prior convictions justified higher sentence for BM; no error in principle or manifest excess in sentences; applications for permission to appeal against sentence refused.

Court Disposition

applications for permission to appeal against sentence refused

Orders

  • extensions of time refused