Duncan McNiven v Isla Jane McNiven & Ors
Duncan is entitled to the net proceeds of sale of No.138, less £13,310 reflecting mortgage payments made by Mrs McNiven, because the 1993 agreement severed the joint tenancy but preserved Duncan's beneficial interest, and proprietary estoppel applies due to assurances, reliance, and detriment.
- Parties
- Claimant: Duncan McNiven; First Defendant: Isla Jane Niven; Second Defendant: Heather McNiven; Third Defendant: Sarah Spencer-Futter
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 December 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for claimant in part
- Legal Topics
- Beneficial Interest, Joint Tenancy, Severance, Proprietary Estoppel, Mortgage Repayment, Intestacy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Duncan McNiven
Claimant
Isla Jane Niven
First Defendant
Heather McNiven
Second Defendant
Sarah Spencer-Futter
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Duncan retained a beneficial interest in No.138 after transfer of legal title in 1993
- 2 Whether proprietary estoppel entitles Duncan to Mrs McNiven's share in No.138
- 3 Extent of mortgage payments made by Duncan and Mrs McNiven
Ratio Decidendi
Duncan is entitled to the net proceeds of sale of No.138, less £13,310 reflecting mortgage payments made by Mrs McNiven, because the 1993 agreement severed the joint tenancy but preserved Duncan's beneficial interest, and proprietary estoppel applies due to assurances, reliance, and detriment.
Court Disposition
Judgment for claimant in part
Orders
- Duncan is entitled to the proceeds of sale of No.138 after deduction of £13,310, which is to be retained by Mrs McNiven’s estate.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment