Brooks, R. v [2017] EWCA Crim 1276 (15 August 2017)
The sentence imposed was excessive in failing to properly apply the principle of totality and to give sufficient weight to the appellant's mitigating circumstances; the sentence on count 2 should run concurrently with count 3, reducing the total imprisonment from 28 months to 22 months.
- Citation
- [2017] EWCA Crim 1276
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: Benjamin Brooks
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 August 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences, Sentencing, Appeal, Totality Principle, Consecutive Sentences, Suspended Sentence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Benjamin Brooks
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Was the sentence imposed excessive in light of the appellant's character and circumstances?
- 2 Should the sentence have been suspended?
- 3 Was the principle of totality properly applied to the consecutive sentences?
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence imposed was excessive in failing to properly apply the principle of totality and to give sufficient weight to the appellant's mitigating circumstances; the sentence on count 2 should run concurrently with count 3, reducing the total imprisonment from 28 months to 22 months.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Sentence on count 2 to run concurrently with count 3
- Total term of imprisonment reduced from 28 months to 22 months
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment