Credico Marketing Ltd & Anor v Lambert & Ors (Rev2) [2021] EWHC 1887 (QB) (06 July 2021)
Claimants were overall winners at speedy trial; costs awarded to claimants for speedy trial and earlier hearings, subject to detailed assessment. Interim payment set at 50% of claimed costs. Leave granted to amend pleadings due to justified late disclosure. Permission to appeal refused as proposed grounds lacked real prospect of success.
- Citation
- [2021] EWHC 1887
- Parties
- Claimant: Credico Marketing Limited; Claimant: Perdm Trading Limited; Defendant: Benjamin Gregory Lambert; Defendant: S5 Marketing Limited; Defendant: Gilles Jean Baudet; Defendant: Power 21 Limited; Defendant: Interactive Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 July 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Litigation / Post Liability, Consequential Orders
- Outcome
- Costs awarded to claimants; leave to amend granted; permission to appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Enforceability of Restrictive Covenants, Costs, Amendment of Pleadings, Permission to Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Credico Marketing Limited
Claimant
Perdm Trading Limited
Claimant
Benjamin Gregory Lambert
Defendant
S5 Marketing Limited
Defendant
Gilles Jean Baudet
Defendant
Power 21 Limited
Defendant
Interactive Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Litigation / Post Liability, Consequential Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether costs should be awarded to the claimants at the liability stage or postponed until quantum
- 2 Whether an issues-based costs award is appropriate
- 3 Whether claimants should be granted leave to amend to add claims for unlawful means conspiracy and unlawful interference
Ratio Decidendi
Claimants were overall winners at speedy trial; costs awarded to claimants for speedy trial and earlier hearings, subject to detailed assessment. Interim payment set at 50% of claimed costs. Leave granted to amend pleadings due to justified late disclosure. Permission to appeal refused as proposed grounds lacked real prospect of success.
Court Disposition
Costs awarded to claimants; leave to amend granted; permission to appeal refused.
Orders
- First and Second Defendants to pay claimants’ costs of proceedings so far, subject to detailed assessment.
- First and Second Defendants to make interim payment of £472,874 within 14 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment