R v Benjamin Norman
The experts in this case could not properly express an opinion as to whether cannabis intoxication or epilepsy was the more likely cause of the collision, as it would be outside their respective areas of expertise. The agreement between counsel not to elicit such opinions was reasonable and appropriate. There was no unfairness to the appellant, and the jury was entitled to reach its verdict on the evidence presented.
- Parties
- Appellant: Benjamin Norman; Respondent: Rex
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Expert Evidence, Insanity Defence, Causing Death by Careless Driving, Controlled Drugs, Burden of Proof
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Benjamin Norman
Appellant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge ought to have permitted expert witnesses to opine on the ultimate issue of the cause of the collision
- 2 Whether the appellant was disadvantaged by the exclusion of expert opinion on the ultimate issue, affecting the fairness of the trial
Ratio Decidendi
The experts in this case could not properly express an opinion as to whether cannabis intoxication or epilepsy was the more likely cause of the collision, as it would be outside their respective areas of expertise. The agreement between counsel not to elicit such opinions was reasonable and appropriate. There was no unfairness to the appellant, and the jury was entitled to reach its verdict on the evidence presented.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal against conviction dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment