R v Benjamin Norman

R v Benjamin Norman

The experts in this case could not properly express an opinion as to whether cannabis intoxication or epilepsy was the more likely cause of the collision, as it would be outside their respective areas of expertise. The agreement between counsel not to elicit such opinions was reasonable and appropriate. There was no unfairness to the appellant, and the jury was entitled to reach its verdict on the evidence presented.

Parties
Appellant: Benjamin Norman; Respondent: Rex
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Expert Evidence, Insanity Defence, Causing Death by Careless Driving, Controlled Drugs, Burden of Proof

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Benjamin Norman

Appellant

Rex

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge ought to have permitted expert witnesses to opine on the ultimate issue of the cause of the collision
  2. 2 Whether the appellant was disadvantaged by the exclusion of expert opinion on the ultimate issue, affecting the fairness of the trial

Ratio Decidendi

The experts in this case could not properly express an opinion as to whether cannabis intoxication or epilepsy was the more likely cause of the collision, as it would be outside their respective areas of expertise. The agreement between counsel not to elicit such opinions was reasonable and appropriate. There was no unfairness to the appellant, and the jury was entitled to reach its verdict on the evidence presented.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal against conviction dismissed