Rolfe & Anor v Bernard Samuel Rolfe Tulsesense Ltd
Wayne Rolfe was appointed as a director by the sole remaining director, Rita, under article 95 of Table A, not by shareholder assent under article 94. As he was not re-elected at the next annual general meeting on 18 December 2008, he ceased to be a director and the company now has no directors.
- Parties
- Claimant: David Rolfe; Claimant: Jacqueline Rolfe; Defendant: Bernard Samuel Rolfe; Defendant: Tulsesense Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 February 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Company Law Petition / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Declaration granted in favour of claimants
- Legal Topics
- Director Appointment and Removal, Interpretation of Articles of Association, Duomatic Principle, Shareholder Assent
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Rolfe
Claimant
Jacqueline Rolfe
Claimant
Bernard Samuel Rolfe
Defendant
Tulsesense Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Company Law Petition / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Wayne Rolfe ceased to be a director of Tulsesense Limited on 18 December 2008
- 2 Whether Wayne Rolfe was appointed as director by the board or by shareholders under the Duomatic principle
- 3 Whether article 95 of Table A was modified or disapplied
Ratio Decidendi
Wayne Rolfe was appointed as a director by the sole remaining director, Rita, under article 95 of Table A, not by shareholder assent under article 94. As he was not re-elected at the next annual general meeting on 18 December 2008, he ceased to be a director and the company now has no directors.
Court Disposition
Declaration granted in favour of claimants
Orders
- Declaration that Wayne Rolfe ceased to be a director of Tulsesense Limited on 18 December 2008
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment