Unilin Beheer BV v Berry Floor NV & Ors [2007] EWCA Civ 364 (25 April 2007)
A final, unappealable English court judgment on the validity and infringement of a European Patent (UK) is res judicata and binding between the parties, regardless of subsequent EPO revocation. The Patents Act 1977 and EPC do not displace English procedural law on estoppel, and there is no statutory or treaty-based intention to treat such judgments as provisional. Business certainty and finality of litigation require that the judgment and its financial consequences stand.
- Citation
- [2007] EWCA Civ 364
- Parties
- Claimant: Unilin Beheer BV; Defendant: Berry Floor NV; Defendant: Information Management Consultancy Limited (t/a Responsive Designs and/or Tapis UK); Defendant: B&Q plc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 April 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Patent Infringement and Validity Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; English judgment is res judicata and not undone by subsequent EPO revocation
- Legal Topics
- Patent Validity, Patent Infringement, Res Judicata, European Patent Convention, EPO Opposition, Estoppel
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Unilin Beheer BV
Claimant
Berry Floor NV
Defendant
Information Management Consultancy Limited (t/a Responsive Designs and/or Tapis UK)
Defendant
B&Q plc
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Patent Infringement and Validity Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a final English court decision on patent validity and infringement is set aside by subsequent EPO revocation
- 2 Whether res judicata applies to European Patent (UK) after EPO proceedings
- 3 Whether English procedural law on estoppel is displaced by EPC provisions
Ratio Decidendi
A final, unappealable English court judgment on the validity and infringement of a European Patent (UK) is res judicata and binding between the parties, regardless of subsequent EPO revocation. The Patents Act 1977 and EPC do not displace English procedural law on estoppel, and there is no statutory or treaty-based intention to treat such judgments as provisional. Business certainty and finality of litigation require that the judgment and its financial consequences stand.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; English judgment is res judicata and not undone by subsequent EPO revocation
Orders
- Unilin's entitlement to financial relief and costs stands; inquiry or account of profits to proceed
- Defendants' application for stay refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment