Knight v Beyond Properties Pty Ltd & Ors
The claimant failed to establish more than a trivial reputation or goodwill in the UK in the name 'Mythbusters' as at November 2003, and in any event failed to prove any actual loss or real likelihood of loss resulting from the defendants' use of the name for television programmes. Accordingly, the claim for passing off fails.
- Parties
- Claimant: Andrew Knight; Defendant: Beyond Properties Pty Ltd; Defendant: Beyond Productions Pty Ltd; Defendant: Beyond International Services Ltd; Defendant: Discovery Communications Inc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 May 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Passing Off / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Passing Off, Goodwill, Misrepresentation, Damage, Descriptive Marks
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Andrew Knight
Claimant
Beyond Properties Pty Ltd
Defendant
Beyond Productions Pty Ltd
Defendant
Beyond International Services Ltd
Defendant
Discovery Communications Inc
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Passing Off / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant had protectable goodwill in the UK in the name 'Mythbusters' as at November 2003
- 2 Whether the defendants' use of 'Mythbusters' for television programmes amounted to misrepresentation
- 3 Whether any actionable damage was caused to the claimant's goodwill
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant failed to establish more than a trivial reputation or goodwill in the UK in the name 'Mythbusters' as at November 2003, and in any event failed to prove any actual loss or real likelihood of loss resulting from the defendants' use of the name for television programmes. Accordingly, the claim for passing off fails.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment