Bezeliansky v Bezelianskaya

Bezeliansky v Bezelianskaya

The court held that the variation of the consent order was justified due to the husband's material non-disclosure and deliberate frustration of the original order, and that the committal orders were proportionate given the husband's admitted breach and substantial means to pay. The appeals and applications lacked merit and were dismissed.

Parties
Appellant: Bezeliansky; Respondent: Bezelianskaya
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 January 2017
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal and Applications
Outcome
appeal dismissed; permission to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Variation of Consent Orders, Enforcement of Financial Orders, Committal for Non Payment, Child Maintenance, Non Disclosure, Executory Orders
Family Law Civil Procedure Variation of Consent Orders Enforcement of Financial Orders Committal for Non Payment Child Maintenance Non Disclosure Executory Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bezeliansky

Appellant

Bezelianskaya

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal and Applications

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the court had jurisdiction to vary the capital provision in the 2013 consent order
  2. 2 Whether the variation was justified in light of non-disclosure and frustration of the original order
  3. 3 Whether committal for non-payment of child maintenance was appropriate given the husband's means

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the variation of the consent order was justified due to the husband's material non-disclosure and deliberate frustration of the original order, and that the committal orders were proportionate given the husband's admitted breach and substantial means to pay. The appeals and applications lacked merit and were dismissed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed; permission to appeal refused

Orders

  • Appeal against variation of consent order dismissed
  • Appeals against committal orders dismissed