ER v BF [2018] EWFC 18 (23 February 2018)
The balance of fairness, including convenience, comes down clearly in favour of the English court continuing to exercise jurisdiction. Both parties were habitually resident in England at the time of the petition, the wife is permanently settled and would face significant hardship litigating in New Zealand, and the English court can resolve all issues in one set of proceedings. The husband's application for a stay is refused.
- Citation
- [2018] EWFC 18
- Parties
- Petitioner: ER; Respondent: BF
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce and Financial Remedies / Application for Stay of Proceedings
- Outcome
- Application for stay of proceedings refused
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Jurisdiction, Forum Non Conveniens, Financial Remedies, Stay of Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ER
Petitioner
BF
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce and Financial Remedies / Application for Stay of Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether English proceedings for divorce and financial remedies should be stayed in favour of concurrent proceedings in New Zealand
- 2 Which jurisdiction is the appropriate forum for resolution of matrimonial issues
Ratio Decidendi
The balance of fairness, including convenience, comes down clearly in favour of the English court continuing to exercise jurisdiction. Both parties were habitually resident in England at the time of the petition, the wife is permanently settled and would face significant hardship litigating in New Zealand, and the English court can resolve all issues in one set of proceedings. The husband's application for a stay is refused.
Court Disposition
Application for stay of proceedings refused
Orders
- Application for stay of proceedings is refused.
- Transcript of the judgment to be prepared at joint expense and may be disclosed to the New Zealand court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment