Tullett Prebon Plc & Ors v BGC Brokers LP & Ors [2010] EWHC 3100 (QB) (29 November 2010)
The matter was not straightforward and required examination of the issues; BGC's opposition indicated complexity. The overall charge was not disproportionate. Costs assessed at £10,865 payable by BGC.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] EWHC 3100 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Tullett Prebon PLC; Claimant: Tullett Prebon Group Limited; Claimant: Tullett Prebon (UK) Limited; Defendant: BGC Brokers L. P.; Defendant: BGC Brokers GP Limited; Defendant: Anthony Neil Verrier; Defendant: Shaun David Carl Edgar Lynn; Defendant: James Robert Hall; Defendant: Robert Leslie Sully; Defendant: Paul James Bishop; Defendant: Steven Harry Harkins; Defendant: Mark Andrew Yexley; Defendant: James Vincent Bowditch; Defendant: Kevin Charles Maurice Cohen; Defendant: Pelham Ashley Temple; Defendant: James Terence Wilkes; Defendant: Gavin David Matthews
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Ruling on Costs Following Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- Costs awarded to Tullett Prebon, assessed at £10,865, payable by BGC.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Disclosure, Confidentiality Club
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tullett Prebon PLC
Claimant
Tullett Prebon Group Limited
Claimant
Tullett Prebon (UK) Limited
Claimant
BGC Brokers L. P.
Defendant
BGC Brokers GP Limited
Defendant
Anthony Neil Verrier
Defendant
Shaun David Carl Edgar Lynn
Defendant
James Robert Hall
Defendant
Robert Leslie Sully
Defendant
Paul James Bishop
Defendant
Steven Harry Harkins
Defendant
Mark Andrew Yexley
Defendant
James Vincent Bowditch
Defendant
Kevin Charles Maurice Cohen
Defendant
Pelham Ashley Temple
Defendant
James Terence Wilkes
Defendant
Gavin David Matthews
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ruling on Costs Following Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the costs claimed by Tullett for the confidentiality club application are proportionate and payable by BGC
Ratio Decidendi
The matter was not straightforward and required examination of the issues; BGC's opposition indicated complexity. The overall charge was not disproportionate. Costs assessed at £10,865 payable by BGC.
Court Disposition
Costs awarded to Tullett Prebon, assessed at £10,865, payable by BGC.
Orders
- BGC to pay Tullett Prebon £10,865 in costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment