Tullett Prebon Plc & Ors v BGC Brokers LP & Ors [2010] EWHC 989 (QB) (06 May 2010)
It would be wrong to make any order for costs incurred after 19 October 2009 due to the existence of Calderbank letters and the unresolved possibility of set-off or reduction; all outstanding matters as to costs are reserved.
- Citation
- [2010] EWHC 989 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Tullett Prebon plc; Claimant: Tullett Prebon Group Limited; Claimant: Tullett Prebon (UK) Limited; Defendant: BGC Brokers L.P.; Defendant: BGC Brokers GP Limited; Defendant: Anthony Neil Verrier; Defendant: Shaun David Carl Edgar Lynn; Defendant: James Robert Hall; Defendant: Robert Leslie Sully; Defendant: Paul James Bishop; Defendant: Steven Harry Harkins; Defendant: Mark Andrew Yexley; Defendant: James Vincent Bowditch; Defendant: Kevin Charles Maurice Cohen; Defendant: Pelham Ashley Temple; Defendant: James Terence Wilkes; Defendant: Gavin David Matthews
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 May 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Liability Judgment; Costs Determination
- Outcome
- All outstanding matters as to costs are reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Indemnity Costs, Calderbank Offers, Part 36 Offers, Injunctions, Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tullett Prebon plc
Claimant
Tullett Prebon Group Limited
Claimant
Tullett Prebon (UK) Limited
Claimant
BGC Brokers L.P.
Defendant
BGC Brokers GP Limited
Defendant
Anthony Neil Verrier
Defendant
Shaun David Carl Edgar Lynn
Defendant
James Robert Hall
Defendant
Robert Leslie Sully
Defendant
Paul James Bishop
Defendant
Steven Harry Harkins
Defendant
Mark Andrew Yexley
Defendant
James Vincent Bowditch
Defendant
Kevin Charles Maurice Cohen
Defendant
Pelham Ashley Temple
Defendant
James Terence Wilkes
Defendant
Gavin David Matthews
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Liability Judgment; Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an immediate order for costs should be made in favour of the claimants against the corporate defendants
- 2 Whether indemnity costs are appropriate given findings of dishonesty
- 3 Effect of Calderbank letters and Part 36 offers on costs determination
Ratio Decidendi
It would be wrong to make any order for costs incurred after 19 October 2009 due to the existence of Calderbank letters and the unresolved possibility of set-off or reduction; all outstanding matters as to costs are reserved.
Court Disposition
All outstanding matters as to costs are reserved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment