BH, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 3079 (08 December 2011)

BH, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 3079 (08 December 2011)

The application was dismissed because the trial judge was entitled to conclude that a fair trial was possible despite the delay, the jury was properly directed on the issue, and no specific prejudice was demonstrated by the applicant.

Citation
[2011] EWCA Crim 3079
Parties
Respondent: Regina; Applicant: BH
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
08 December 2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Rape, Historic Sex Abuse, Abuse of Process, Delay in Reporting, Fair Trial

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

BH

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction

  1. 1 Whether the indictment should have been stayed as an abuse of process due to delay in reporting and alleged prejudice to the applicant's ability to receive a fair trial

Ratio Decidendi

The application was dismissed because the trial judge was entitled to conclude that a fair trial was possible despite the delay, the jury was properly directed on the issue, and no specific prejudice was demonstrated by the applicant.

Court Disposition

application dismissed