R v BHB
The appeal was dismissed because the trial judge exercised his discretion properly in refusing to discharge the jury, the evidence on the remaining counts was sufficient for the jury's consideration, the exclusion of certain evidence was correct as it was irrelevant, the jury directions were adequate to prevent improper speculation, and the late disclosure did not cause material unfairness or render the conviction unsafe.
- Parties
- Appellant: B.H.B.; Respondent: Rex
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 July 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences, Jury Directions, Disclosure Obligations, Appeal Against Conviction, Credibility of Witnesses
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
B.H.B.
Appellant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in refusing to discharge the jury after late disclosure and changes in the prosecution's case
- 2 Whether the judge was wrong to refuse submissions of no case to answer on certain counts
- 3 Whether exclusion of certain defence evidence was proper
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the trial judge exercised his discretion properly in refusing to discharge the jury, the evidence on the remaining counts was sufficient for the jury's consideration, the exclusion of certain evidence was correct as it was irrelevant, the jury directions were adequate to prevent improper speculation, and the late disclosure did not cause material unfairness or render the conviction unsafe.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment