BHQ, R. v (Re Jurisdiction Only) [2023] EWCA Crim 1018 (08 September 2023)

BHQ, R. v (Re Jurisdiction Only) [2023] EWCA Crim 1018 (08 September 2023)

An appeal lies to the Court of Appeal from a preparatory hearing ruling on abuse of process if the ruling determines a question of law relating to the case, but appellate intervention is only justified where there is legal error, misdirection, or irrationality; in this case, leave to appeal is refused as no such error was found.

Citation
[2023] EWCA Crim 1018
Parties
Applicant: BHQ; Respondent: THE KING
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
08 September 2023
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (jurisdictional Ruling)
Outcome
Leave to appeal refused; application dismissed.
Legal Topics
Abuse of Process, Jurisdiction, Preparatory Hearing, Appeals

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

BHQ

Applicant

THE KING

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (jurisdictional Ruling)

  1. 1 Does the Court of Appeal have jurisdiction to hear an appeal from a preparatory hearing ruling on abuse of process under section 31(3) CPIA 1996?
  2. 2 Are rulings on abuse of process 'questions of law relating to the case' for the purposes of interlocutory appeals?

Ratio Decidendi

An appeal lies to the Court of Appeal from a preparatory hearing ruling on abuse of process if the ruling determines a question of law relating to the case, but appellate intervention is only justified where there is legal error, misdirection, or irrationality; in this case, leave to appeal is refused as no such error was found.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal refused; application dismissed.

Orders

  • Permission to cite this judgment granted.