BHQ, R. v (Re Jurisdiction Only) [2023] EWCA Crim 1018 (08 September 2023)
An appeal lies to the Court of Appeal from a preparatory hearing ruling on abuse of process if the ruling determines a question of law relating to the case, but appellate intervention is only justified where there is legal error, misdirection, or irrationality; in this case, leave to appeal is refused as no such error was found.
- Citation
- [2023] EWCA Crim 1018
- Parties
- Applicant: BHQ; Respondent: THE KING
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 September 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (jurisdictional Ruling)
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal refused; application dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Abuse of Process, Jurisdiction, Preparatory Hearing, Appeals
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BHQ
Applicant
THE KING
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (jurisdictional Ruling)
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the Court of Appeal have jurisdiction to hear an appeal from a preparatory hearing ruling on abuse of process under section 31(3) CPIA 1996?
- 2 Are rulings on abuse of process 'questions of law relating to the case' for the purposes of interlocutory appeals?
Ratio Decidendi
An appeal lies to the Court of Appeal from a preparatory hearing ruling on abuse of process if the ruling determines a question of law relating to the case, but appellate intervention is only justified where there is legal error, misdirection, or irrationality; in this case, leave to appeal is refused as no such error was found.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal refused; application dismissed.
Orders
- Permission to cite this judgment granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment