R v BHR & Anor

R v BHR & Anor

The Court of Appeal cannot reduce a sentence based on assistance provided to law enforcement after sentencing unless the assistance was offered before sentencing or falls within wholly exceptional circumstances; the statutory procedure under section 388 of the Sentencing Code is the only route for post-sentence assistance to be considered for sentence reduction.

Parties
Applicant: BHR; Applicant: BMV; Respondent: Rex
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
applications for extension of time and leave to appeal against sentence refused
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Assistance to Law Enforcement, Appeals, Anonymity Orders, Contempt of Court

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

BHR

Applicant

BMV

Applicant

Rex

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the Court of Appeal has power to reduce a sentence where assistance to law enforcement is provided after sentencing without a formal statutory agreement
  2. 2 Whether exceptions exist to the general rule that assistance must be offered before sentencing to obtain a reduction

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal cannot reduce a sentence based on assistance provided to law enforcement after sentencing unless the assistance was offered before sentencing or falls within wholly exceptional circumstances; the statutory procedure under section 388 of the Sentencing Code is the only route for post-sentence assistance to be considered for sentence reduction.

Court Disposition

applications for extension of time and leave to appeal against sentence refused

Orders

  • Applicants to remain anonymous; reporting restrictions imposed under section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act 1981 prohibiting identification of applicants in any report.